Общественное объединение "Сутяжник"

Главная страница

Новости судебных дел

Судебное дело "О праве пожизненно заключенного и его жены на проведение искусственного зачатия"


Заявление в ЕСПЧ с вопросом о применении срочных мер по правилу 39 Регламента ЕСПЧ, а также с сообщением об определении Бабушкинского районного суда от 10 марта 2017 года об отказе в пересмотре решения от 25 декабря 2014 года.

 

20.03.2017

 

   The Registrar

   European Court of Human Rights

   Council of Europe

   F-67075 Strasbourg CEDEX

   France

                                                               BY COURIER

                                                            20 March 2016

   Contact Person: 

   Anton Burkov

   620075, Russia, Yekaterinburg,

   Turgenev Str., 11-1 


   Korolevy v. Russia

   No 47668/15

   submitted 18 September 2015

                                  Request 

     on the application for interim measures of 14 September 2016 to be
   submitted to a judge for decision on applicability of interim measures

   Dear Mr. Ryngielewicz,

   On 19 October 2016 I acknowledged receipt of your correspondence of 21
   September  2016 rejecting the applicants' request under Rule 39 of the
   Rules of Court.

   On  20  December 2016 I informed you that after learning the fact that
   the  Registrar  considered  applicants'  request under Rule 39 to fall
   outside  the  scope of Rule 39 and it had therefore not been submitted
   to   a   judge  for  decision,  the  applicants  insisted  that  their
   application  be  submitted to a judge for decision on applicability of
   interim measures to their case.

   The applicants have not heard back since.

   By  this  correspondence  I  once again inform you that the applicants
   insist  that their application be submitted to a judge for decision on
   applicability of interim measures to their case. The applicants insist
   that  they  are  facing  an  imminent  risk of serious and irreparable
   damage  of  losing  the ability to conceive children. If (which is not
   admitted)  it  is unclear whether the applicants' case is suitable for
   interim  measures,  then  this is likely because the legal question of
   the  applicability  of interim measures in the applicants' case is not
   straightforward or suitable for administrative determination.

   I  also  would  like  to  inform you by this correspondence that on 10
   March  2017  the  risk of serious and irreparable damage of losing the
   ability  to  conceive  children  significantly increased due to recent
   decisions  by  local  courts  in  the  applicants'  case.  Despite the
   Constitutional Court's judgment of 15 November 2016 No 24-P (Annex 2),
   which  softened  the conditions of detention of lifers by allowing the
   applicants one conjugal meeting per year, the Babushkin district court
   of Moscow rejected (Annex 5) the applicants' motion of 24 January 2017
   (Annex  3 and 4) for reconsideration of the Babushkin district court's
   decision  of 25 December 2014, which rejected the applicants' right to
   artificial  insemination  (the  core  issue in the case of Korolevy v.
   Russia   No   47668/15).   The   rejected  motion  was  based  on  the
   Constitutional Court's judgment of 15 November 2016 No 24-P (Annex 2).

   Therefore, I would like to ask this Court that

   1.  this  letter be considered as the applicants' further request that
   their  application  for  interim  measures  of 14 September 2016 to be
   submitted to a judge for decision on applicability of interim measures
   to their case.

   2.  this  letter  with  annexes  be considered as supplementary to the
   initial application submitted on 18 September 2015 as well as addition
   to the initial request for interim measures of 14 September 2016.

   3. the Court communicate directly with me via my eComms account of the
   European  Court  of  Human  Rights  Electronic  Communication  Service
   (account name is anton.burkov@gmail.com)

   Annexes:

   1. Application to the Constitutional Court.

   2. Judgment of the Constitutional Court No 24-P of 15 November 2016.

   3. Motion of 24 January 2017 to the Babushkin district court of Moscow
   to  reconsider  the Babushkin district court's decision of 25 December
   2014.

   4. Addition to the motion to reconsider the Babushkin district court's
   decision of 25 December 2014.

   5. Decision of 10 March 2017 by the Babushkin district court of Moscow
   rejecting  the applicants' motion of 24 January 2017 to reconsider the
   Babushkin district court's decision of 25 December 2014.

   Yours faithfully,

   Anton Burkov

   The applicants' legal representative


Если вы хотите поддержать нашу деятельность, то введите в поле ниже сумму в рублях, которую вы готовы пожертвовать и кликните кнопку рядом:

рублей.      


Поделиться в социальных сетях:

  Diaspora*

Комментарии:

Добавить комментарий:

Ваше имя или ник:

(Войти? Зарегистрироваться? Забыли пароль? Войти под OpenID?)

Ваш e-mail (не обязателен, если укажете - будет опубликован на сайте):

Ваш комментарий:

Введите цифры и буквы с картинки (защита от спам-роботов):